Ghulam
Muhammad Khan Bhurgri’s Speech
Welcome Address In the Special Conference,
Hyderabad.
This speech was delivered by Bhurgri at
Hyderabad
on occasion of Sindh Special
Conference in the capacity of Chairman
Reception Committee.
"Brother Delegates and respected
participants I welcome you on behalf of
reception committee and am thankful to all,
as you have taken pains to attend this
conference. I understand that the
arrangement for your stay has not been
perfect as should have been done. I
therefore apologize for this lapse. I
request you to ignore, this difficulty
keeping in view the sentiments in our
hearts.
Respected delegates you are aware that this
conference has been convened to consider an
important subject. Before deliberating the
subject, it is our duty to assure the
British Government that we are their
supporters, particularly in this position of
war in which England has incurred huge
expenditure more than her revenue earnings
for three years. The English have not taken
part in the war to earn something but they
are desirous to restore justice in the state
and save smaller nations from the aggression
of big and oppressive countries. The war
sentiment has not receded till today. The
India has played its role nicely and
scarified for the Government. She has not
only performed her duty but to render
unconditional love and faith in favor of the
Government. It is still not known as to when
the victory would be achieved and war would
be over. Till the victory of justice,
independence and objective of the Government
are not achieved; it is our duty and right
to help England. We should always pray for
the victory of allied powers.
Dear participants now I come to the agenda
of this meeting. You are aware that our
purpose of gathering here is to consider the
measures to develop our province. It could
be evident from the study of India's common
public affairs. You know that after war is
over, the reconstitution of the Government
is to be considered. In that proposal India
wants to have her share. For that right
India's two major parties, the Indian
National Congress, and All India Muslim
League have examined the subject threadbare.
This right addresses to two main issues, one
that the government should publish at
charter indicating the parameters of future
government, the other part deals with the
reforms to be introduced after the war and
our demands. These are evident. They
demanded through a resolution that:
a)
It is a fact that India's major communities
are the custodians of the country since
ancient times possessing capabilities to
govern and administer the public affairs. If
the development in education and provision
of service to the nation by the English
government during last 100 years is
considered, it would be evident that the
system has not been successful to fulfill
the common needs and demand of the people.
Therefore the Congress is of the opinion
that His Majesty should publish a charter
declaring that the English desire to accede
to the demand for establishment of the
self-government in the India very soon.
b)
Congress demands that the self-government
should be established completely taking full
and final action. For this, the reforms
recommend by the Congress Muslim League
Committee should be implemented in letter
and spirit.
c)
In the reconstitution, India should be
elevated from the status of sub-ordination
to that of equal level of governance in
other parts of the government.
I do not want to go into further details on
these reforms. Every Indian owns these
proposals and there is no need to further
explain the matter. I further emphasize that
this is a preliminary demand being the first
episode of the reforms and is the minimum of
what is actually required. We are not ready
to accept less than what has been outlined
in the resolution. The implementation of
complete reforms will not satisfy us forever
but it would be only help for the present
for the reason that these reforms are part
and first step of our rights. We have full
right of independence within the country as
is provided to other settlements. That
independence means," Self-government should
participate fully with other partners in the
government at equal level under the British
crown." That is our objective. When we
demand Home Rule or the self-government, it
does not mean not to accept British
supremacy or we want cessation from the
British Empire. This is contrary to the
demand and desire of Indian people. This
thought is baseless and aware people of
India as well as England understand this
issue very well. For example Mr. Frances
Young Husband, recently in a meeting said,"
The Indian political leaders, based on the
will of millions of people, do not have the
desire to break the connection with the
England; however they desire to have
independence within the government and not
outside. Dear Sir, now let us consider the
reason for demanding self-government. The
main reason is that we understand that it
will accrue countless benefits. Swaraj will
also benefit the government fostering our
relations with each other, not breaking at
any times, having permanent feature. It will
promote love and respect among each other.
Government will run with the desire of
people promoting public affairs and business
smoothly. The officers will serve under
control of the people who are now at the top
of the ruling stage. They will have to step
down and kept at the appropriate positions
under the control of people and answerable
to the public.
The self-government will provide us the
institutions having real representation of
the public, directly accountable to the
people. We shall defend ourselves with the
help of Suraj and formation of defense force
for national protection. For that purpose,
Weapons will be provided to the people.
Self-government will also help in revenue
collection and control over state
expenditure with justified and co-operative
farming system. The expertise and trade will
expand in India; the education will be made
common, judiciary and executive be
separated. For implementation of these
reforms, there is a consensus based on
demand of the people since many years. These
reforms will benefit the people largely as
this is the only treatment of the disease.
The reforms will also remove the defects
that have made the government's face ugly. I
understand that some dangerous
misunderstandings have developed in the
bureaucracy and their followers. These
misunderstandings have badly affected the
Home Rule movement. If we probe the matter a
little bit, it would be apparent that the
objections commonly raised are unfounded and
only posed to detriment the greatest and
holy movement.
The first objection has been based on the
hypothesis that home rule is not the
compulsory right and the demand if abrupt
and unattractive. These are dangerous
hostilities. This objection is based on
either honesty or dishonesty. If it is based
on dishonesty, its considering is a big
mistake. In case, it has been honestly
raised, then the knowledge of the movers
regarding history of national movements is
questionable. They are in fact not conscious
of the situation resulting in the negative
assessment. For the honest critics, I shall
only say a sentence based on truth that can
be repeated repeatedly. That sentence truly
is that, "The right of self-government is
based on the principle of natural justice
since birth of every human being." This
right, based on the justice and liberalism
is the pride of British government. A large
number of British intellectuals have upheld
this right. This right has been protected by
the British government itself and acted upon
in letter and spirit. People are grateful
for that act but only say that
implementation is very slow. This right is
being demanded by the National Congress and
Muslim League from time to time.
Second objection has been ascribed that,
‘the demand for home rule is beyond the
limit’. Why? This is the right of
independence then, is it awful to demand in
dependence? Liberal and experienced people
demand not less than that. Do the people of
England demand for themselves less than
independence? Whether colonies demand less
than that? Is it not the fact that
independence is the national life of
England? Is it not a fact that the
foundation of then nationalism is
independence? What is other status and pride
of England? They claim colossal love with
the independence. The history of England is
no other continuous effort and struggle for
the independence with the prime objective of
uprooting the oppression and cruelty. First,
tell me about the object of this war that
has squeezed foremost goal to protect the
sacred land of independence from tarnishing.
If this is not the war of principles then
what is it? Has the India not supported
England to win the war of principles? Shall
the India say that the principles for which
they have given blood and accepted the death
are not meant for the Indians? This reply is
not given by the common British nation to
the Indians for which they have been
continuously struggling to attain Swaraj and
is supporting India on that count. India is
grateful to them. The British government at
its own has been assuring the Indians that
their pledge i:: sacred and their prime
objective is to lead and help India to
achieve Swaraj.
Third objection regarding home rule is that
proper time for this demand has yet to come
and the demand is premature. If
self-government is opposed, no objective
will be achieved. Therefore, this new
strategy has been adopted pleading that the
time has not come for the demand, and as
such, it is not our right. In the past they
did not agree to even concede a little right
to us. Now, they say that, we have the right
but this right is premature. Is it so? Have
we not been capable of self-rule? We, who
are the custodians of the most ancient
civilization, we are the successors of those
who were famous for their knowledge and
wisdom in the times when west was living in
the jungle. They had proved their
capabilities to rule and undertake business
as and when they opted to do so. This
capability was not only exposed prior to the
British rule, but even now, it is evident
from the local states. We are the nation
from where such people emerged who could be
compared with the intellectuals of any
country. We are the people who created
Panchayats in the ancient times sowing the
seeds of self-government. In addition,, that
Panchayat system has been continuing
perfectly despite various upheavals. We are
those who elected the king and that system
is continuing. See the Islamic system. What
is the Islamic system? We can say that
Islamic system is the essence of government
by the people. In the past Caliph was
appointed after his election by the people.
We are not capable of self-rule but the
citizens of Philippines and Gua are capable.
If we are not capable then how could we
attain capability? Who will fix the time for
attaining capability? Whether those people
will decide who want to deny this legitimate
right. We are being kept away from the right
of making us capable in your eyes, and then
tell us how could we achieve the goal? Once
Lord McCauley said, "it was wise not to
permit the people self-government until the
people themselves prove that they were
capable of running such government." This
principle is of the wisdom and compared with
the finding that until a person is not
capable of swimming, he should not be
allowed to enter the water. Similarly, they
say that prove your capability without
giving us the opportunity, is uncalled for.
Similarly, they want to ensure that no such
opportunity should be given to us on that
account. The other objection is that common
people, being illiterate cannot protect
themselves. They have different views and
therefore, they cannot consult each other
and undertake other works. Who is
responsible for illiteracy? Who is
responsible for their helplessness and
idleness? Who opposed and failed the Free
and Compulsory education bill? Who had
introduced the Arms Act? How is this
possible that you are the reason of our
weaknesses as well as against us? All these
shortcomings are the basic reason for
demanding home rule for India. These should
not be reasons to oppose and negate the home
rule by the bureaucracy. If there are many
opponents of home rule, even then, we have
already proved our capability to run the
self-government. One of the proofs is the
demand of home rule itself made by us. Mr.
Bahamas, famous writer in his book,
entitled," Democracy and Reaction",
published ii 1905, has stated that the East
has yet to prove its ability to go for
self-rule as per people's demand. But in
this connection national intellectuals and
statesmen should be unanimous that their
demand is based on facts and that its
capability has not been declared. In that
case, their primary demand is appropriate
example. For capability, it is vital that
people are themselves eager to demand the
self-rule having strong desire and
capability of self-recognition. They must
react to the foreign rule. It should be
remembered that if these conditions prevail
the independence could flourish. The experts
of human psychology state that in case
governing system having towering principles
are imposed upon the backward nations, the
results could be damaging. The development
in such conditions should be gradual. The
argument is fair. But this principle cannot
be applied when people become highly aware
to introduce such a system with highly
valuable principles. It is the duty of the
capable intellectuals to develop such
concepts ever, on the cost of the numerous
difficulties in their government.
These demands have been placed before the
Indian government. The government of India
is not confronting with the principles that
are in the air. We do not ask for the
application of the principles that are in
practice in England, but we have to get the
benefits as endorsed by the Indian people by
application in the reality. Our
intellectuals are considering such
principles and in that connection, they are
to be tested as how do they stand on the
stage of the independence.
One of the objections against the Home Rule
is that a few selfish educated people are
demanding this. This is not the fact as the
prime object of the representative and
responsible government is that the public
should have control that can only be
exercised through their representatives and
not directly. It should be remembered that
the people would elect these representative,
most probably from the educated lot. It is
not correct to say that educated
representatives are not the representatives
of the people. This theory negates the
principle of representative government. This
is strange to say that the nation has no
citizens and their family members. They have
been born and brought up indigenously with
their people; they know their country having
natural rights with their people. They can
understand their thoughts, sentiments,
demands, desires and hopes very well. This
kind of concept is natural without any
artificial element. The educated are in the
support of their people with truthful,
proof. The educated are working hard to help
the common people. Who demanded compulsory
education system in the Council for benefit
of the common people? Who supported the
Credit Cooperative Movement that benefited
the public? When the agonies in South Africa
triggered, who raised the voice? It should
be left to the common people to decide as to
who are their representatives and
well-wishers. Has it ever happened that
common people have declined to accept
educated people as their representatives?
The strange and stranger group of people and
officers who have no right to be the
representatives of common people has started
this movement. These officers are alien to
the birth, history, customs, traditions,
heart and brains of Indians. They have no
natural relation, having a little local
experience and are not aware of Indian life,
association, languages, systems, customs,
habits, inner desires, relations, objects
and hopes and for them they have
misunderstandings. Evidently, these baseless
and bogus thoughts should always be ignored
but deliberated only for the reason that the
educated have been unnecessarily blamed.
This weapon given to the officers has
blocked the hopes of the common people. It
is a barrier between the people and the
government. How has this happened? The
government claims that it is the
representative government of die people. If
it is so, the government and peoples
thinking should be the same. What is in the
benefit of people should also be beneficial
to the government and if anything is
detrimental to the public, it should be
damaging to the government. Who is
responsible for the current situation, which
is deteriorating day by day? Why should the
people start movement, be it the Home Rule
or even against the government or common
evils such as, Rasai, Chher or repressive
laws or bail for good conduct from the
people or even for the non-damaging meeting
of zamindars leading to the annoyance of the
officers. It is most important that this
gulf is increasing day by day, being
detrimental to the Government as well as
public. It has also resulted in the reduced
interaction of the officers with the people.
Nature and history both state that heart and
soul of the people cannot be captured with
any force and all efforts in that relation
have failed rather damaged the objective.
Where such repressive acts have been applied
against the independent thoughts, it has
posed problems. If the people take no
action, it culminates into some disease that
is immunized resulting in dishonesty toeing
the line of bureaucracy. The people, who are
habitual of getting benefit from Government,
bow down their heads before the officers
creating a section of people who always
praise the Government for their benefits.
These people do not care for their respect
and do not reveal the facts and are selfish
in their acts and do not care for the rights
of their brothers and damage the relations
and rights of the people. This section of
society is neither representative of people
nor is responsible to anyone. These people
have no character and they are damaging the
nation. They are the bad organs having
cancer liable to cut and remove to protect
the body from fatal disease. This movement
against home rule has been created either by
the officers or by their followers who fully
participate to gain favors from them. In my
opinion, either officers are unaware of the
facts or they deliberately keep themselves
away from the prevailing conditions in the
society. This is not a wise act. It is very
damaging to close the eyes not recognizing
the facts. If the facts are not accepted and
restored, then there would be no success.
There is no power to defeat the truth. King
Chanute when proved before the people that
the velocity of the ocean cannot be stopped,
in fact he wanted to prove this law. The
officers either cannot see this reality or
they do not intend to accept the facts. It
is fact that India has attained the national
identity and the officers would be wise if
they accept this statement. As state 1
above, Mr. Habhaos says that "when we accept
that new sprit has been created in the East,
it does not mean that everywhere there would
be success." It may lead to the Russian
reforms implemented in Turkey. May be Indian
officers dominate liberal English statesmen
and King of Iran may control with the help
of Kosakan or without their help. Once, when
the people are awakened then the old
traditions cannot prevail as these are bound
to disappear. It is ridiculous to think that
the East has made a start now. It should be
kept in the mind that till today all the
religions have been given to the World by
the East. The East has given half of the
Philosophy. East has never been aggressive
to conquer and dominate other nations, but
East has always advocated the spiritual
liberalism and taught many lessons to the
West. In turn, the East has learnt a lesson
that the objective of the life is not to be
compromised and defeated under
any circumstances. They have
learnt from Japan that practical science is
not the sole authority of the Europeans.
They have also learnt that they can raise
and manage the Navy and Army in the East.
The last objection is "against the authority
of the Government that at this delicate
point of time raising this question is the
wastage of time creating confusion in the
governance. They argue that this demand does
not suit now for the reason that Government
is busy in the World War. Therefore, such
demands should not be raised now. These
people have not understood the movement in
connection with the Government. Real and
regular home ruler has not demanded that
Government should immediately introduce home
rule in India. Nevertheless, the demand is
that after the war is over and the work of
restructuring of government is taken up,
then India should be given the legitimate
right of self-rule. It is advisable to make
all the preparations in advance and
proposals finalized to act upon without
further loss of time. You must understand
that the aware people have never raised
these objections. This statement is
substantiated by the fact that some other
English colonies are demanding right of
self-rule with the help and assistance of
the Minister, Mr. Bonarala. Besides, these
objections have also lost importance as the
British Government has itself taken some
steps during the war to introduce reforms in
the Government of India. In the House of
Commons, the government has recently
declared principles of reforms in the India,
as such the restlessness and agitation in
India has been normalized for the time
being.
Now let us consider the desirable reforms in the
country. It must be remembered that the reforms
demanded by us are the first step toward
retaliation of self-government. At the initial
stage, we demand that in the governance, common
people should have the sufficient authority. For
that purpose, it is essential to have system
whereby the government should be responsible to
the people. We do not demand the minor changes
in the system, but ask for complete reforms
leading to the implementation that creates a
system having full and real control of the
common people and the elected representatives.
We have no differences with a particular group
of the people, but we are against the current
governing system. The bureaucracy should be
abolished and in its place government
responsible to the people be constituted. People
now demand major overhauling and real changes in
the system as the minor and superficial changes
would not meet the requirements. The basic
changes in the system are the real answer to all
the troubles and in case no change is made in
the officers, there is no need to be bothered.
This is wrong understanding of the people that
we demand to replace the British with the
Indians to run the government. This is not the
object of any body and this hope is baseless.
However, if the present system of the government
is continued, there is no hope of improvement.
But if the reforms are implemented as per our
scheme, then there would be no protest and gap
if the reign of the government is with the
British. Gentlemen the question regarding future
government of India is so fragile and important
that this is responsibility of the people as
well as the government to properly resolve it.
The government has understood this, important
question by releasing three nationalist leaders,
Mrs Annie Besant, Mr. Arandale and Wadia
resulting in peace and contentment in the
country. For this act of wisdom, whole India is
grateful to the government. We may have
different feelings for their arrest, but on
their release, we congratulate the government
and we, with all the Indians request the
government to release all the prisoners from
jails particularly two brothers M/S Muhammad Ali
and Shaukat Ali whose arrest has put the whole
Muslim community under the state of anguish.
This demand is substantiated all the way through
the numerous resolutions passed in the meetings
for their release. Therefore, it is hoped
enormously that government at this sensitive
time would order immediately to release both the
brothers to meet the demand all over the
country. Despite the demand of majority, we are
receiving negative signals as recent speech of
Lord Pentland and the incident attached to Sir
Michael Dyer have broken our hearts. Even then
we Indians have firm belief in the
statesmanship, justice and fairness of the
English that cannot be misled at any stage.
Based on this trust the British government has
recently considered allowing Indians more
freedom in the national affairs. For that, the
people of India are extremely grateful to the
British government and the Secretary of State
for India. It is a big and cheerful juncture for
us that Honorable Mr. Montague, Secretary of
State for India, renowned statesman, champion of
justice, and promoter of liberal international
principles, is himself coming to consider the
proposal formulated for the reforms. This
gentleman has been assigned this intricate and
important assignment, on which the future
development of millions of Indians depends. We
understand the he will come across many
difficulties and hurdles particularly by the
people who had been taking illegitimate favors.
Therefore, it is the duty of Indian citizens to
make maximum efforts and create an atmosphere
enabling the Secretary of State for India to
solve this complicated problem. Mr. Montague is
certainly capable of solving the problem as his
speeches regarding public affairs of India show
that his thoughts and principles are most
liberal and based on the justice. At the
occasion of report on the Mesopotamia, he used
the following words in the House of Commons,
giving us the hope and strength that this
gentleman will certainly do justice and not
hesitate to decide the matter judiciously.
Mr. Montague says that, "When I see around that
the colonies under our control and the states in
India are enjoying self-government and I clearly
see that whole English Empire is not a
government, but its separate parts are
self-governments and at the top the British
government is formed. What kind of government
you foresee in India? It is your choice but it
is apparent that all the Indians with whom I
have communication or to whom I have addressed,
desire to know about the ultimate future and
form of Government in India. Therefore it is
required that as to how you are going to adopt
the reforms as a first step. From the reforms it
will be seen whether the Indian representatives
are given the control over the executive
officers or not. If you give power to the local
people then the supervision from England will be
reduced. I am fully confident that earlier the
system of government enforced there was
satisfactory, but the report of Mesopotamia
clearly indicates that it was not so as the
people had no role in the governance. This war
has given you to understand that Indians are
loyal and supporting us in the odd times. This
loyalty is in fact part of their religion. It is
now essentially required that you should get
real benefits of their loyalty and if you desire
to own them, provide them opportunity of
self-rule. In that case, even if there is some
other war, these loyal Indians will certainly
help you standing by your side on equal basis.
If you do not change the old and out dated
system of government quickly, certainly you will
be losing the right of governance over India."
After above statements dealing with the Indian
government, now I come to the main object of
convening this conference. Dear brothers, the
objective is to consider the matter relating to
share of Sindh in the reforms collectively. The
state of government in Sindh is quite different
from very beginning, hence different and special
treatment is required to change the system. In
our case, the governance is different from other
parts. Here we are being governed by one
autocratic office with no provision of council
to advice on the public affairs. This kind of
system of government is not functioning in any
of the provinces in India. Not only this but
even in Bombay no such system is enforced in any
part. It is one man rule that too opposed to the
liberal opinion. This system seems strange and
terrible. It is the legacy of the past, which
will not be liked in the moderate and advanced
times. Rarely will we find a person supporting
this outmoded system. For this kind of
government, special reasons and arguments are
required, which might have been made under the
extreme compelling reasons. But here no such
reason is seen and compelling circumstances are
being encountered by the government to form such
a government. If such requirement was m the past
it is not wise to continue such a system under
any circumstances. The problem is inbuilt in the
system of the government; therefore, it is not
required to change the attitude of a particular
officer. The future economic and social
development of Sindh entirely depends on the
formation of such government. The development of
Legislative and Executive Council shall not in
any case benefit the people of Sindh till the
present system of the government continues as
such any change in the system of the Councils
will not benefit us. It is therefore evident
that we have to work hard in comparison to other
parts of India and particularly for our own
province. The demand to be made is to be decided
by you and for that purpose, we have gathered in
this conference. Everyone from you will
definitely demand that we do not need "one man
rule." This is our unanimous and forceful
demand. I understand that we should follow one
of the following four alternatives:
(1)
First alternative is this that Sindh should be
made a separate province having Legislative
Council, without forming Executive Council for
the reason that expenditure of Executive Council
cannot be afforded by this province and without
Executive Council, the Legislative Council will
be of no use. The legislative Council is meant
for exercising control over the Executive
Council and if the Executive Council is not in
existence, the question of forming Legislative
Council does not arise. Therefore, I am of the
opinion that this proposal is not feasible.
(2)
The second alternative is to merge Sindh and
Baluchistan and both the Governors should be
under Darajlas. I dislike this proposal, as we
will be merged with an alien country whose
development status is at primitive stage.
Therefore, our development will be hindered and
we will remain backward.
(3)
The third alternative is to merge Sindh and
Punjab and then both the Governors should work
under one Governor Darajlas. (Committee under
the Chairmanship of Governor) I know that this
proposal will be criticized. Having weaknesses,
nobody can say that this proposal is better than
the current state of affairs. In both the cases
the Punjab and Sindh have the same river;
therefore this will benefit the agriculture.
This is universally known but both provinces
have continuous dispute on the river water. This
proposal has a benefit that it will constitute
an authoritative High Court providing basis for
justice.
(4)
The fourth and last option is that Sindh should
remain under the Bombay government participating
with all other parts of Bombay. In my opinion
this way is feasible. It will provide good
result as no major change would be required for
resolving the problem. Only the powers of
Commissioner-in-Sindh should be transferred, the
Bombay, having direct control of Executive
Council over Sindh. Our demand is that this
authoritative system of the government should be
done away with and Sindh be made at par with
other parts. With the demand of this right,
Sindh will also get the benefit of having
similar judicial system as enforced in other
parts.
Here Sindh Sadar Court is separate
from the High Court. In the Sadar Court there
are only three judges, of these two are from the
civil service. It is clear that this kind of
High Court should not be formed. These reforms
were demanded in the 11th Provincial
conference at Bombay convened in 1901. A person
having personal knowledge of the present
judicial system moved this resolution and he was
a famous and highly experienced lawyer. I am
referring to Dewan Teckchand Udhadas who is
Honorable member now. I propose that a bench of
Bombay High Court should be established at
Karachi. I understand that such system is also
working in other parts. Many other reforms are
required for Sindh. I have taken much time
therefore; leave these issues for deliberation
by the President and others. For example,
reforms for Local self-Government and request to
the government for release of interned Sindhis.
Government has asked to collect house tax
forcibly, this and other main questions, I leave
for taking up in the conference. Gentlemen, I
have taken undue advantage of your patience, but
the issues are very important and sensitive. In
the end I have to say something. lt is my duty
to appreciate educated youngsters who performed
very well even in the hard trial. They have
shown their courage and patience in the
suppression. They are the natives with new signs
of the glorious dawn. I am fully confident that
the day of success will come very soon."